Can a goal from one standard be based on work done in another standard?

A goal from one standard can indeed be based on work done in another standard, particularly when they are related to a Quality Improvement (QI) initiative. In the context of oncology data management, many standards are interconnected, as they often address related health outcomes, patient safety, or care efficiency. Utilizing insights and findings from one standard can enhance the goals set within a QI initiative, leading to better overall patient care and outcomes.

For example, if a hospital implements a new procedure based on an oncology standard that improves patient management, this new understanding can inform goals in a different standard related to patient safety or quality of care. These connections facilitate comprehensive improvements and promote a more integrated approach to enhancing oncology practices and patient experiences.

In contrast, the idea of all goals being entirely independent does not reflect the reality of how standards are often designed to work synergistically. Furthermore, while noting exceptions can provide flexibility, it does not capture the essence of how QI initiatives thrive on the interrelation of standards to achieve meaningful improvements. Hence, focusing on the relationships between standards within the framework of QI initiatives yields the most substantial benefits in oncology data management.