Central registry XY manually evaluates every 10th abstract from each batch of abstracts submitted to them by reporting hospitals. This process is:

The process of manually evaluating every 10th abstract from batches submitted by reporting hospitals is known as visual editing. This practice typically involves reviewing and assessing the quality and completeness of the abstracts to ensure that the data aligns with established standards and guidelines. Visual editing focuses on the verification of content accuracy, proper coding, and adherence to formatting requirements. This step is crucial in maintaining the integrity of the data collected by the central registry.

In the context of tumor registries and cancer data management, visual editing serves to enhance the reliability of the data that will ultimately be used for patient care, research, and statistical reporting. It allows registrars and data analysts to identify potential discrepancies, inaccuracies, or missed information in the abstracts.

Other processes, such as casefinding, involve identifying and reporting cases of cancer rather than evaluating existing data, reabtracting pertains to correcting or revising abstracts that have been submitted, and record consolidation is the merging of overlapping data records rather than the evaluation of abstract quality. These processes serve different purposes within the realm of oncology data management.